Abstract
This research explores ecofeminism as both a critical lens and a mobilising framework for restructuring international climate accords. It departs from the premise that the exploitation of the natural world and the subjugation of women are intrinsically linked to shared patriarchal and capitalist genealogies. The study highlights a paradigmatic shift in climate discourse—moving beyond technocratic mitigation strategies toward a holistic "climate justice" framework that internalizes gender justice and decenters Western-centric governance. Crucially, the research analyzes the feminist movement’s trajectory within the UN system, specifically highlighting its evolution during the Paris Agreement (2015) from symbolic presence to an institutionalized power capable of securing binding rights-based language and "gender-responsive" mandates. However, the study identifies a persistent "rhetoric-implementation gap" between international declarations, National Determined Contributions (NDCs), and climate finance, exacerbated by systemic constraints and the persistence of socio-blind technical approaches. Ultimately, it argues that genuine climate sustainability necessitates a shift from mere "nominal recognition" to the "redistribution of epistemic and financial authority," ensuring that feminist praxis is central to a truly just and transformative transition
References
1. Agarwal, Bina. “Gender and Environmental Governance.” Oxford Review of Economic Agarwal, Bina. “Gender and Environmental Governance.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 26, no. 2 (2010): 287–300.
2. Allan, J. I., and R. R. Bhandary. “What’s on the Agenda? UN Climate Change Negotiation Agendas since 1995.” Climate Policy 24, no. 2 (2024): 153–166.
3. Arora-Jonsson, Seema. “Virtue and Vulnerability: Discourses on Women, Gender and Climate Change.” Global Environmental Change 21, no. 2 (2011): 744–751.
4. Bee, Beth A., and Karen Smith. “Gender and Climate Change: The Impacts of Climate Change on Women.” Geography Compass 10, no. 12 (2016): 447–461.
5. Buckingham, Susan, and V. Hansson. “The Gender–Environment Connection: A Key Dimension of Sustainable Development.” Geographical Journal 170, no. 4 (2004): 243–254.
6. Calliari, Elisa, Olivia Serdeczny, and Lisa Vanhala. “Making Sense of the Politics in the Climate Change Loss & Damage Debate.” Global Environmental Change 64 (2020): 102133.
7. Chan, Sander, Thomas Hale, and Oscar Widerberg. “Assessing the Effectiveness of Orchestrated Climate Action by Non-State and Subnational Actors.” Nature Climate Change 12, no. 7 (2022): 630.
8. Flavell, Jack. “From Gender-Blind to Gender Bind: Foregrounding Gender in the History of the UNFCCC.” Global Environmental Politics 24, no. 1 (2024): 31–51.
9. Gaard, Greta. “Ecofeminism and Climate Change.” Women’s Studies International Forum 49 (2015): 20–33.
10. Gaard, Greta, and Lori Gruen. “Ecofeminism: Toward Global Justice and Planetary Health.” Society & Nature 2, no. 1 (1993): 1–35.
11. Gay-Antaki, Miriam, and Diana Liverman. “Climate for Women? Gender Policy and the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.” Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space 1, no. 3 (2018): 451–470.
12. Harcourt, Wendy, and Ingrid Nelson, eds. Practising Feminist Political Ecologies: Moving Beyond the ‘Green Economy’. London: Zed Books, 2015.
13. MacGregor, Sherilyn. Beyond Mothering Earth: Ecological Citizenship and the Politics of Care. Vancouver: UBC Press, 2004.
14. MacGregor, Sherilyn. “Only Resist: Feminist Ecological Citizenship and the Politics of Climate Change.” Hypatia 29, no. 3 (2014): 617–633.
15. Merchant, Carolyn. The Death of Nature: Women, Ecology, and the Scientific Revolution. San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1980.
16. Obergassel, Wolfgang, et al. “The Potential of International Institutions to Foster Transitions: The Example of the Global Stocktake under the Paris Agreement.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 57 (2025): Article 101005.
17. Puig, Daniel, Fatemeh Bakhtiari, Saleemul Huq, and N. Nasr. “Loss and Damage in the Global Stocktake.” Climate Policy 22, no. 2 (2022): 175–183.
18. Rajamani, Lavanya. “Ambition and Differentiation in the 2015 Paris Agreement: Interpretative Possibilities and Underlying Politics.” International and Comparative Law Quarterly 65, no. 2 (2016): 493–514.
19. Shiva, Vandana. Staying Alive: Women, Ecology, and the Scientific Revolution. London: Zed Books, 1988.
20. Terry, Geraldine. “No Climate Justice without Gender Justice: An Overview of the Issues.” Gender & Development 17, no. 1 (2009): 10.
21. UNFCCC Secretariat. The Paris Agreement: Preamble and Gender References. Bonn: UNFCCC, 2016.
22. UN Women. Women at the Frontlines of Climate Action. New York: UN Women, 2020.
23. United Nations. Agenda 21: Programme of Action for Sustainable Development. New York: United Nations, 1992.
24. United Nations. Paris Agreement. New York: United Nations, 2015.
25. Warren, Karen J. Ecofeminist Philosophy: A Western Perspective on What It Is and Why It Matters. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2000.