Political Utilization and the Biden Administration’s Approach to United Nations Programs

Abstract

Abstract                 

  

Countries seek to use political employment as a key tool in dealing with crises, both at the local and international levels. This research aims to explore the relationship between political employment and the Biden administration’s approach toward United Nations programs, as well as their role in shaping international policies. Since Joe Biden assumed the presidency, his administration has adopted a new approach aimed at rebuilding alliances and enhancing international cooperation in addressing global challenges such as climate change, security threats, and competition with China and Russia.

President Joe Biden’s administration has relied on international institutions—particularly the United Nations—as a means of strengthening its influence in the Middle East through diplomatic channels, sanctions, humanitarian aid, and conflict resolution. Washington has leveraged UN agencies to support its strategies, whether by pressuring regimes that do not align with its policies or by expanding its influence.

pdf (Arabic)

References

1. Luey Sabouh al-Hajj, Political Utilization of International Issues as a Pretext for Humanitarian Intervention, Tishreen University Journal for Research and Scientific Studies, 2018, p. 23, 26.

2. What’s the Difference Between Political Appointees and Career Politicians? U.S. Constitution website, available at: https://www.usconstitution.net/appointees-vs-career-employees/

3. Al-Munya al-Abadi, Political Utilization: A Series of Political Crises and Custom-Fitted Continental and International Organizations, published June 19, 2019, at: https://www.tunissaeuromed.com/

4. The Bayan Magazine, The Problem of Political Utilization, Vol. 341, No. 17, 2015.

5. Nasser Bandar al-Daihani, The Political Utilization of Media in Foreign Policy, Master’s Thesis, 2009, p. 12.

6. Arjen Boin, Paul ’t Hart, Eric Stern, and Bengt Sundelius, The Politics of Crisis Management: Public Leadership under Pressure, Cambridge University Press, 2016, pp. 2–3.

7. Lev M. Sokolshchik, Year One of the Biden Administration: U.S. Foreign Policy Towards Russia, Journal of Eurasian Studies, Vol. 15(1), 2024, pp. 73–74.

8. Joseph S. Nye, Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics, New York: PublicAffairs, 2004.

9. United Nations, Two Resolutions Adopted on Ukraine, published February 24, 2025: https://news.un.org/ar/story/2025/02/1139356

10. Al-Araby, To Protect Uyghurs: New U.S. Measures Against Chinese Economy, June 16, 2021: https://www.alaraby.com/news

11. Asharq Al-Awsat, Biden Administration Intensifies Genocide Accusations Against China’s Uyghur Policy, January 28, 2021: https://aawsat.com/home/article/2771541

12. Yun Sun, U.S.–China Engagement in Africa: A Crossroads, Brookings Institution, March 3, 2025: https://www.brookings.edu/articles/us-china-engagement-in-africa-a-crossroads/

13. Ekow Dontoh, Mirette Magdy & Alister Bull, Africa at the Center of IMF-WB Talks Amid U.S.-China Rivalry, Business Mirror, October 9, 2023: https://businessmirror.com.ph/2023/10/09/africa-is-front-and-center-at-imf-wb-meetings-as-us-china-rivalry-heats-up/

14. U.S. Department of State, Outcomes of the 54th Session of the UN Human Rights Council, available at: https://2021-2025.state.gov/outcomes-of-the-54th-session-of-the-un-human-rights-council/

15. Ahmad Mohammed al-Aidi, U.S. Political Decision-Making and Presidential Psychology, Journal of Political and Economic Studies, Vol. 23, No. 1, 2024, p. 696.

16. Kelsey Davenport, UN Missile Sanctions on Iran Expire, Arms Control Association: https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2023-11/news/un-missile-sanctions-iran-expire

17. United Nations, Call to Reengage with Iran Nuclear Deal, December 2024: https://news.un.org/en/story/2024/12/1158306

18. Vali Kaleji, UN Sanctions Expiration’s Limited Effect on Iran Arms Trade, Jamestown Foundation: https://jamestown.org/program/expiration-of-un-missile-sanctions-has-limited-effect-on-irans-arms-trade/

19. Şuay Nilhan Açikalin, A New and Alternative Leadership Model in Foreign Policy Analysis, Janus.net, Vol. 12, No. 2, 2022, p. 117.

20. U.S. Department of State, UN High-Level Pledging Event for Yemen, https://2021-2025.state.gov/un-high-level-pledging-event-for-humanitarian-crisis-in-yemen/

21. Sahar Dorani, Foreign Policy Decision-Making Approaches and Applications, The Rest: Journal of Politics and Development, Vol. 9, No. 2, 2019, pp. 69–89.

22. Jan Egeland et al., Humanitarian Aid and the Biden Administration: Lessons from Yemen and Syria, Washington Institute: https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/humanitarian-aid-and-biden-administration-lessons-yemen-and-syria

23. U.S. Department of State, Secretary Antony J. Blinken at the UN Security Council Ministerial on the Middle East: https://2021-2025.state.gov/secretary-antony-j-blinken-at-the-un-security-council-ministerial-meeting-on-the-situation-in-the-middle-east/

24. Anas Kouyez Ben Allal, Expectations of U.S. Policy under the President, Arab Democratic Center, December 6, 2020: https://democraticac.de/?p=71477

25. Joseph R. Biden, Executive Order on Tackling the Climate Crisis at Home and Abroad, 2021, p. 3.

26. Scientific American, Why the U.S. Rejoined the Paris Agreement—and What Comes Next, 2021, p. 34.

27. Joseph R. Biden Jr., Why America Must Lead Again, Foreign Affairs, Mar./Apr. 2020: https://fam.ag/3bQCHFe

28. Dmitrii Khasanov, How U.S.–China Chip Restrictions Are Reshaping Tech Investment, Forbes, July 8, 2025: https://www.forbes.com/councils/forbesbusinesscouncil/2025/07/08/how-us-china-chip-restrictions-are-reshaping-the-global-tech-investment-landscape/

29. Brussels Summit Communiqué, NATO, June 14, 2021: https://bit.ly/3q7cx6k

30. Graham Allison, Destined for War: Can America and China Escape Thucydides’s Trap?, Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2017, p. 3.

31. John Mearsheimer, Structural Realism, in International Relations Theories, ed. by Dima al-Khudra, Arab Center for Research, Doha, 2019, p. 245.

32. United Nations, GA Debates Russian Federation’s Veto on Ukraine Peace, February 2025: https://press.un.org/en/2025/ga12677.doc.htm

33. United Nations, Human Rights Situation in Russian-Occupied Ukraine, available at: https://ukraine.ohchr.org/en/human-rights-situation-during-russian-occupation-territory-ukraine-and-its-aftermath-EN

34. Nathaniel Weixel, Biden Administration Suspends Wuhan Lab Funding, The Hill: https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/4105610-biden-administration-suspends-funding-to-wuhan-lab/

35. Maggie Miller, Biden Administration Rolls Out Cybersecurity Strategy, Politico: https://www.politico.com/news/2024/05/06/biden-international-cybersecurity-plan-00156190

36. The White House, President Biden Acts Against China’s Unfair Trade Practices, May 2024: https://bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2024/05/14/fact-sheet-president-biden-takes-action-to-protect-american-workers-and-businesses-from-chinas-unfair-trade-practices/

37. Yossi Mekelberg, Trends in U.S. Policy Under President Biden, Nerends Research and Consulting, Vol. 48, No. 55, 2021, p. 123.

38. Ali Eldin Hilal, What’s New in Biden’s Foreign Policy, Strategic Horizons Journal, Issue 2, 2021, p. 556.