Abstract
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) has become one of the most prominent manifestations of the modern technological revolution due to its remarkable capacity to influence the lives of individuals and societies. Despite the extensive benefits it offers across various fields, its increasing adoption has generated significant ethical and intellectual challenges concerning the future of humanity and the values that govern society. In light of these developments, philosophical thought emerges as an essential framework for understanding the ethical dimensions of technological advancement and for examining its implications for freedom, justice, and human responsibility. It also contributes to establishing ethical foundations that ensure AI technologies are developed and employed in ways that serve humanity and safeguard fundamental human rights.Political thought, in turn, plays a pivotal role in formulating the public policies that regulate the development and deployment of artificial intelligence in pursuit of the public interest. Drawing upon its core principles of justice, liberty, and accountability, political thought contributes to the establishment of legislative and regulatory frameworks that balance technological innovation with the protection of individual rights and freedoms. It further assists policymakers in enacting laws that define the legal and ethical responsibilities associated with the design, development, and use of AI systems. Moreover, political thought strengthens mechanisms of oversight and governance by promoting transparency, accountability, and the prevention of the misuse of AI technologies. In this respect, it provides both the intellectual and legislative foundations necessary to guide artificial intelligence toward advancing human welfare and achieving sustainable development.Accordingly, this study seeks to examine the role of philosophical and political thought in addressing the ethical challenges posed by artificial intelligence. It does so by analyzing their theoretical foundations and exploring their potential to develop a balanced ethical framework capable of fostering a responsible and sustainable relationship between human beings and emerging AI technologies.
References
قائمة المصادر:
1-المصادر العربية:
1-أرسطو. (1998). الأورغانون (إسحاق عبيد، مترجم). بيروت: دار المشرق.
2-بنثام، ج. (1996). مقدمة في مبادئ الأخلاق والتشريع. أكسفورد.
3-ديكارت، ر. (1994). تأملات في الفلسفة الأولى (كمال الحاج، مترجم). بيروت: دار النهار.
4- سارتر، جان بول. (1998). الوجود والعدم (ترجمة عبد الرحمن بدوي). دار الآداب
5-هوبز، ت. (1991). الليفياثان (عبد الرحمن بدوي، مترجم). دار النهضة.
6-كانط، إ. (1992). أسس ميتافيزيقا الأخلاق (فؤاد زكريا، مترجم). الهيئة المصرية العامة للكتاب.
2-المصادرالاجنبية:
1-Aristotle. (2004). Nicomachean ethics. Cambridge University Press.
2-Boden, M. A. (2016). AI: Its nature and future. Oxford University Press.
3-Bostrom, N. (2014). Superintelligence: Paths, dangers, strategies. Oxford University Press.
4-Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Polity Press.
5-Coeckelbergh, M. (2020). AI ethics. MIT Press.
6-Council of Europe. (2024). Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law (CETS No. 225). Council of Europe.
7-Crawford, K. (2021). Atlas of AI: Power, politics, and the planetary costs of artificial intelligence. Yale University Press.
8-European Parliament & Council of the European Union. (2024). Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act). Official Journal of the European Union.
9-Floridi, L. (2011). The philosophy of information. Oxford University Press.
10-Floridi, L. (2013). The ethics of information. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199641321.001.0001
11-Floridi, L. (2023). The ethics of artificial intelligence: Principles, challenges, and opportunities. Oxford University Press.
12-Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., Luetge, C., Madelin, R., Pagallo, U., Rossi, F., Schafer, B., Valcke, P., & Vayena, E. (2018). AI4People—An ethical framework for a good AI society: Opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations. Minds and Machines, 28(4).
13-Floridi, L., & Cowls, J. (2019). A unified framework of five principles for AI in society. Harvard Data Science Review, 1(1).
14-Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Vintage Books.
15-Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Harvard University Press.
16-Gunkel, D. J. (2012). The machine question: Critical perspectives on AI, robots, and ethics. MIT Press.
17-Habermas, J. (1990). Moral consciousness and communicative action. MIT Press.
18-Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. MIT Press.
19-Heidegger, M. (1977). The question concerning technology and other essays. Harper & Row.
20-Jobin, A., Ienca, M., & Vayena, E. (2019). The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1.
21-Jonas, H. (1984). The imperative of responsibility: In search of an ethics for the technological age. University of Chicago Press.
22-Kant, I. (1997). Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals. Cambridge University Press.
23-Kant, I. (1998). Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals (M. Gregor, Trans.). Cambridge University Press.
24-McCarthy, J. (2007). What is artificial intelligence? Stanford University.
25-Mill, J. S. (1998). Utilitarianism. Oxford University Press.
26-Noddings, N. (1984). Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education. University of California Press.
27-OECD. (2019). Recommendation of the Council on Artificial Intelligence (OECD/LEGAL/0449). OECD.
28-OECD. (2024). Governing with artificial intelligence: Are governments ready? OECD Publishing.
29-Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019). Recommendation of the Council on Artificial Intelligence (OECD/LEGAL/0449). OECD Legal Instruments.
30-Putnam, H. (1975). Minds and machines. Prentice Hall.
31-Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Harvard University Press.
32-Rawls, J. (1999). A theory of justice (Rev. ed.). Harvard University Press.
33-Russell, S. (2019). Human compatible: Artificial intelligence and the problem of control. Viking.
34-Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (2020). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach (4th ed.). Pearson.
35-Searle, J. R. (1980). Minds, brains, and programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(3).
36-Turing, A. M. (1950). Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind, 59(236).
37-UNESCO. (2021). Recommendation on the ethics of artificial intelligence. UNESCO.
38-United Nations. (2024). Global Digital Compact. United Nations.
39-United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2022). Recommendation on the ethics of artificial intelligence. UNESCO. (Original recommendation adopted November 23, 2021).
40-Vallor, S. (2016). Technology and the virtues: A philosophical guide to a future worth wanting. Oxford University Press.
41-World Economic Forum. (2023). The future of jobs report 2023. World Economic Forum
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.